Does Your #amwriting contain the words Thought, Wondered, Realized?

“Thinking is abstract.  Knowing and believing are intangible.  Your story
will always be stronger if you just show the physical actions and
details of your characters and allow your reader to do the thinking and
knowing.  And loving and hating.” –Chuck Palahniuk 

Fiction writing tips by Chuck Palahniuk
Chuck Palahniuk on Fiction Writing

This is from an essay I read on and in the last year, it has changed my writing. Chuck goes on to say: 

“Instead of characters knowing anything, you must now present the details that allow the reader to know them.  Instead of a character wanting something, you must now describe the thing so that the reader wants it.

In short, no more short-cuts.  Only specific sensory detail: action, smell, taste, sound, and feeling.”

Whenever I spot a line that  says something like:

He knew she would react like that.

I try to replace it with:

He had watched her years ago as she took a pair of shears to the sweater she’d worked on for over a month. Bits of snipped wool and color lay scattered on the floor around her as she lay on the floor, knees curled into her stomach, mimicking the baby she’d lost. 

He hadn’t approached her then, and he wouldn’t now.

This is ‘show don’t tell‘ applied to the character and the language, and the unpacked details and action convey emotion that the words ‘he knew’ can’t. 

Which version do you think works better? Do you use ‘thought’ verbs in your writing?

I love comments, and I always visit back. Blogging is all about being a part of a community, and communities are about communication! Tweet me up @damyantig !


Add Yours
  1. New House Girl

    Hi Damyanti,
    I've read these thoughts about showing and telling by chuck P. before and it was refreshing to reread parts of his essay again. Thank you for posting it! Showing is always better than telling, unless you can get a joke out of the telling! In other words, it's a good rule of thumb but sometimes rules are meant to be broken. Have a great day!
    –Alicia, comedy writer

  2. Mukulika Basu

    An interesting point, in fact this method allows the reader to connect more with the plot. Just as For the writer, its a chance to infuse more minute details to his characters, for the reader, its a chance to look at the events from the character's point of view, as they have more inof on the latter's psyche.

  3. Jocelyn Rish

    I read Chuck's essay a while back and mostly agreed with it. But like everything else, I think there can be pitfalls. Sometimes within the flow of the story it's more expedient (or even better matches the character's voice) to say, "Uh oh, I think I pissed him off." So like with all writing techniques, I think we have to work on finding the right balance for the story.

    • Damyanti

      This is the very same post I'm talking about– I'm not sure the site you have linked to has taken permission from the author. I did not reproduce the entire article here, just quoted from it.

  4. Nistha

    A point nicely made. As Chekov said – "Don't tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass."

  5. L.G. Smith

    Yep, it's something I mark up when I'm critiquing a lot. Just being in the voice of the characters tells us it's them doing all the "knowing, seeing, feeling," etc. You don't need to use those words. Makes for much stronger writing to leave those out.

  6. J.L. Campbell

    Damyant, good example that works. I'm lazy and showing takes a lot more work than telling. Just the number of words you've used here demonstrates that, however, since I learned that I hardly use the words you mentioned. Being in the character's mind creates immediacy and connects reader to character to I strive for that.